home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
112894
/
11289937.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-01-31
|
2KB
|
55 lines
<text id=94TT1669>
<title>
Nov. 28, 1994: Government:The Dynamic New Buzz Word
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Nov. 28, 1994 Star Trek
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
GOVERNMENT, Page 32
The Dynamic New Buzz Word
</hdr>
<body>
<p> `Dynamic scoring' sounds like something composers or quarterbacks
do. But in fact it's the hottest buzz word from the realm of
Republican legislators, who hope to use the economic technique
to justify tax cuts. Already the term has ignited a controversy.
Laura D'Andrea Tyson, the President's chief economist, calls
the concept "dangerous." But Republican John Kasich of Ohio,
who is expected to head the House Budget Committee in the new
Congress, is just as strongly in favor of the idea.
</p>
<p> Scoring is a Washington term for estimating the impact of changes
in tax and spending policy on federal revenue. Traditionally,
economists and estimators use "static scoring," in which a cut
or increase in taxes is presumed to have a directly proportional
effect on revenues. In other words, if taxes are cut 10%, revenues
fall 10%. Thus fiscal responsibility demands that tax cuts be
paired with matching cuts in spending.
</p>
<p> The dynamic-scoring models hold that a 10% tax cut may boost
economic activity by lifting the yoke of taxation off workers
and businesses, which affects not only their own behavior but
the performance of the economy as well. Increased economic activity
means that the government's incoming revenues might actually
be enhanced by tax cuts. Thus, using the dynamic-scoring model,
tax cuts don't always require matching spending cuts.
</p>
<p> Liberals charge that dynamic scoring is a latter-day version
of Reagan-era voodoo economics, a way of slashing taxes without
making painful budget cuts. Says Tyson: "We have just gained,
after more than a decade, some credibility with financial markets
through the hard-won credibility and sanity of our fiscal policy.
This is not the moment to change." But Republicans argue that
they have an example of how dynamic scoring could have predicted
failure: the luxury tax of 1990, which produced disappointing
revenues because it crushed the boat industry.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>